The Consequences of Run Away Health Care Costs

Estimates today put the US per capita health care spending at $9,000 a year.  For a family of four this represents $36,000.  Most families do not see this magnitude because their employer picks up the lion share and Medicare covers most of the expensive years.  Still health care costs, such as out of pocket expense or the employee share of his employer provided policy, sends most screaming “foul” when presented the bill.

The estimated bill for the entire US is about $3 trillion annually, or about 19% of the entire GDP.  For comparison sake, this is slightly larger than all the Federal taxes collected and 3% short of all Government spending.  This is a gigantic expenditure.

Putting US expenditures in a different perspective, for example in comparison to other selected countries.   In a 2008 study, the US boasted a health care expense of 16% GDP while the other countries studied ranged from 8% to 11%.  Something seems odd.  Why are the US figures for much higher?

If the US were as efficient with health care expenditures as the most expensive of the other countries, health care costs could drop by a third.

Unfortunately, that would not be the end of health care cost creep.  All other major countries still report national budget conflicts with the relentless rise in health care costs.  But getting our costs a third lower is an attractive target just the same.

This new, lower health care cost world would have some differences from what Americans know today.  Health care plan administrators (formerly the Aetna’s and Cigna’s of the world) would simply pay claims and keep records.  What these administrators covered and how much they actually paid would be set by a national non-political board of medical professions.  Coverage would be universal.  (Potentially, as in Germany, there might be a second layer of coverage which could provide coverage not available in the national plan.)

There would still be the problem of how to pay for health care.  Presumably if American businesses did not have to provide coverage, that cost could go “one time” into increased wages and salaries.  Then, individuals would need to pay their own way.  Or, a national tax system could be established, or possibly some combination of both.

Not so fast.  We should expect the predictable laments.

  • “Too much government” despite the fact that a national board would be composed of non-government employees.
  • “I don’t want to be forced to buy coverage” despite the fact that those who do not buy insurance  games the system.
  • “We have the best health care in the world and this will ruin it”.  The data shows the US does not have the best health care in the world, but clearly any change can be fraught with the potential for problems.

The most obvious changes involve the loss of capitalization value for many health care organization as well as the loss of $900 billion that flows annually to hospitals, doctors, and drug companies.  Doctors, hospitals, and drug companies will simply not receive the same revenues as before.  This would mean lower wages, salaries, and fees being paid as well as a sharp drop in the stock value of publicly traded health care providers.

Sound good?  I guess it depends upon where you stand.  Do you pay or do you collect?

The numbers speak.

The country could decide to hold firm with our current health care delivery system.  That path is clear, it is the one we are on.  So expect each year to see a bigger piece of GDP (and each person’s budget) going to health care and not other discretionary spending.

Alternatively, the US could look to a Universal health care model with a target health care cost as a percent of GDP, and decide to move towards it over, say a 10-15 year period.  While it would be feasible to adopt Universal health care faster, the dislocations will be severe.

Evolution in this case might be better than revolution.

Explore posts in the same categories: Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Politics, Republican Party

Tags: , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

2 Comments on “The Consequences of Run Away Health Care Costs”

  1. Dustin Says:


    I read your piece on birth control and the Catholic church over at, and I strongly agree with you.

    I also have never seen a blog host more thoroughly abuse and disrespect one of his contributors as Solomon did to you in the comments thread. It was truly ugly.

    It baffles me that good-natured and smart people continue to provide him with their content and tolerate his persistent abuse of anybody who even mildly disagrees with or critiques him. Jess Chapman admitted to me that his behavior is bad but that she’s unwilling to confront him.

    Just about every thread he threatens someone while being verbally abusive — while telling THEM to tone it down. It’s perverse.

    Notice that he doesn’t bat an eye at resident rightwing freakshow Leonidas’s “Obama was playing Pope,” and he even agreed with his false “government please pay for my sex life” attack on liberals, but he went after you without hesitation.

    That’s not reasonable centrism. That’s just a spiteful asshole spoiling for a fight. I think you’re far too generous to him to have to put up with that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: