Pacific Trade Debacle

Democrats joined together this week to thwart President Obama’s request for fast track negotiating status on the proposed trade deal among 14 Pacific rim countries. Apparently responding to strong requests from organized labor and environmental groups, Democrats voted overwhelmingly to deny fast track status. Hmmm.

Opponents claim the Trade bill will cost American jobs. I wonder where these people have been over the past twenty years as American company after company has outsourced American jobs to lower wage countries? The consequence has been increased profits for American businesses and huge downward pressure on the average American worker.   To the positive side, it must be recognized outsourced jobs has contributed to a steady low inflation rate (read lower cost of living). So what can be so bad this time?

Outsourcing works (in economic terms) when the country losing the jobs reemploys the workers in other more productive activities. Even though 20 years sounds like a long time, America’s work force has not upgraded itself enough to find gainful work for too many of those outsourced. Accordingly it can be understood why Americans would be worried when Unions tell them how bad this Trade legislation will be.

The only problem is that no trade bill is worse!

Post World War II, the United States possessed over 60% of the worlds manufacturing capacity. Finding a manufacturing job was like finding a local bar, they were everywhere. Business leaders, anxious to make a buck bid against each other in order to attract and retain workers. This became the norm and few people thought that life could or would be different.

During this post war time plenty of countries (like most of Europe, Japan, India, and many Latin and South American countries all engaged in some form of restrictive, protective Trade arrangements. Each of these countries tried to protect their favored industries against “foreign” competitors. Imagine France protecting its industries from German or Spanish ones. That’s like New Jersey building borders against goods from Pennsylvania or New York. The bottom line has been that those trade barriers lead directly to low quality, high prices, and economic stagnation.

The same fate awaits America if we ignore Pacific rim trade.

A far better use of the opponents’ time would be to establish rules on what American businesses can do with overseas profits if outsourcing does occur. Outsourced labor is creating profits for American companies by either lowering the cost of products imported and sold in the US or simply creating new profits in a US subsidiary overseas, or both. Currently that subsidiary’s profit is housed in the lowest tax jurisdiction outside the US and remains there avoiding US taxes. No one wins on that deal.

Taxing US corporate profits attached to our soured jobs and dedicating these revenues to retraining labor might be a useful outside the box move.

Forgetting the greed aspects of business (especially American style), the idea that the US can go it alone ignoring access to 40% of the world’s markets on equal basis is ludicrous. Experience has taught us that we can not expect business leaders to consider the best interests of American labor also.

So, tell me again why the President should not negotiate with fast track authority?

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Barack Obama, congress, Democratic Party, Fast Track, Outsourcing, Politics, Republican Party, trade

2 Comments on “Pacific Trade Debacle”

  1. List of X Says:

    The fast track authority is an option for the White House to put the agreement for a congressional vote as is, with no amendments allowed. If you think that this agreement is absolutely perfect and can’t possibly be improved in any way – which I don’t think you can honestly say since you don’t actually know what exactly is in it, because this agreement has been kept under tighter wraps than military secrets from the general public but not from corporations.
    So while i’m not necessarily opposed to the agreement itself, I absolutely don’t feel comfortable with giving it a fast track given the atmosphere of secrecy in which it’s being negotiated.


    • X, fair enough… The problem is that the Pacific rim trade agreement is going forward with or without us. The idea that over 500 Congress members can improve upon the deal is a stretch to say the least. Congress has a chance to vote up or down when the agreement is finalized.

      It is entirely possible, I admit, that the deal negotiated so far is not the most favorable for every special interest in the US. My guess is Unions and environmentalist want language which would be irrelevant to enhancing trade. Rather these groups want further restrictions that favor themselves versus consumers as a whole.

      This is unfortunately one more example of President Obama snatching defeat from the jaws of victory…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: