Archive for the ‘unions’ category

Waking Up Unions

June 16, 2015

Most people reading this post’s title will immediately think, “oh its about time Unions got their backs up and protected their rights and their jobs”. Well that is sort of what this post is about but it has an entirely different twist.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has provided a case book method for bringing public sector unions to heel. (1) While running for office, do not mention unions as a problem waiting to be fixed. (2) Once in office, move quickly and target only non-police and fire public sector unions (divide and conquer). (3) After the heat dies down, target all other unions by changing State law to a “right to work” State. Quick and efficient.

Wisconsin public service unions never figured out what was happening or why. To protest, unions resorted to the time honored practice of marches and demonstrations. Apparently union leadership did not recognize that much of Wisconsin voters did not understand why State employees should have pay and working conditions so much better than the average worker. Hmmm.

The Trans Pacific Partnership trade proposal is providing another example of unions out of touch with current times. Listening to union representatives crow about having defeated fast track authorization for President Obama, one can only ask, “tell me why again?”

Unions respond, “we want a better deal, one that preserves American jobs”.

At first this seems eminently reasonable. Why should the US make any trade agreements that syphon American jobs away? The problem is no deal does not prevent the economic migration of US jobs to lower wage countries. When that happens, Americans lose their jobs full stop.

European countries have instituted various types of labor protections should a business want to reduce local labor or even in the event of full plant closure. These countries impose a cost upon the business for each job lost. Part of the money goes to the worker and part goes to fund “retraining” programs. These costs make businesses think carefully about outsourcing or taking large risks which might endanger the businesses’ long term health.

(In truth it also encourages businesses to not expand employment until they absolutely must. Opportunistic employment, like we see in the US oil industry where many are hired when the sun shines and let go when oil prices fall, is not seen in Europe.)

The obvious first step for US labor is to begin dialog with businesses and acknowledge the high cost legacy pay and benefits represents to US business’ globally. Negotiating two tier wages and benefits has been tried in many situation and is worthwhile expanding. Businesses, however, would prefer to de-certify existing unions or block the certification of new ones. In that manner, businesses could hire and fire with impunity.  This behavior begs the need of Federal statues.

A longer shot but potentially more powerful would be for unions to shape public opinion especially around businesses who employ greedy hiring practices or give workers a poor deal. Think about the many consumer goods which carry special labels such as “sustainable”, “organic”, or “does not contain x, y, or z.

Consumers, therefore, should be capable of understanding that company X has reduced American labor, put the profit in their pockets, and given nothing to either the laid off worker or the consumer.  What should the consumer do?  Hmmm.

Disney recently began a practice of importing lower wage workers to replace home grown workers at their Amusement parks. While there can be no argument that replacing Americans with “better” foreign workers at the same pay and benefit levels, outsourcing work by importing lower wage workers seems over the top. And, what would Mickey Mouse say?

Of course not all workers are victims.  Anyone who observes government employees at city, county, State or Federal levels cannot help but notice that over the years these workers gain weight, slow down, and often get sick at very high rates. These are people to be sure but low productivity in the private sector results in business going out of business.

On one hand, blatant disregard for workers as Disney has shown should receive a public’s disapproval vote through lower attendance. On the other hand, unions truly interested in providing productive and competitive workers needs to work with companies on adopting new productivity tools and well as continuous worker training. If necessary, unions should insist upon adequate separation pay for displaced workers as well as funds for retraining.

Blocking the TPP and then blasting about it is a great disservice to union members and to the country as a whole.

Advertisements

New York’s Not So Finest

January 5, 2015

On Saturday, America got to see a moving and honorable tribute to a fallen public servant, NYPD Officer Wenjiun Liu. America also got to see sprinkled in the sea of blue, a dangerous rogue element. Without saying it, the Police Union showed gratuitously why unions can so easily go astray.

The gist of this story is that a number of police officers turned their backs on the televised image of Mayor Bill De Blasio when he spoke in eulogy of Officer Liu. This demonstration stood in contrast to the calls by the Mayor’s office to honor the death of Officer Liu and leave any dissatisfaction to the bargaining table.

The back turning demonstration has almost nothing to do with remarks De Blasio has made over recent police shootings in Ferguson, Cleveland and New York. Instead the turned backs are all about the stuck negotiation on a new police contract. No one should be fooled by anyone claiming these back turners were protesting the lack of police support. As usual it is all about money.

This situation has brought forward some very unpleasant thoughts. Were these back turners insubordinate? Would these back turners escalate their contract dissatisfaction and withhold other normal police routines? And, most fundamental, who is in charge, the Police Commissioner (and the chain of command) or a fifth column headed by the Union President?

Wage and benefit negotiations are complicated to say the least. Just about all unions have resisted any changes in benefits like healthcare cost sharing or reduced pensions. Police like firemen are public servants we depend upon every day. On one hand they deserve to be well treated, on the other hand, few people want to pay more in taxes. Finding the right balance of pay and benefits and voter willingness to support is not easy. A strong union is essential if the police force is to get a fair shake in negotiations. The problem arise when the “strong union” leaders try new tactics and go too far, not anticipating the collateral damage.

Patrick Lynch, head of New York’s Policemen’s Benevolent Society (the union) sees things differently. Life is about the contract and everything else is fair game as a means to obtain an acceptable contract. An honorable person should be able to separate an assassinated police officer’s funeral from hard nosed contract negotiation.

One must conclude Lynch has come up short on the honorable part.